Important Disclaimer: The editor of this journal and manager of this model portfolio is not as an employee of Marketocracy or any of its affiliates but is an independent investment researcher acting solely as an independent contractor. Marketocracy expressly disclaims any control over (i) the editor's statements and opinions on this Site or elsewhere and the content thereof, and (ii) the editor's activities and the activities of other investors influenced by the editor, including securities trading activities, for which the editor and such other investors are solely responsible. Before relying on the editor's opinions, always assume that the editor and other investors influenced by the editor have material financial interests in these stocks and hold or trade them contrary to those opinions. Continue reading for more detailed important disclosures, disclaimers and material conflicts of interest.

Continue reading "Disclaimer" »

June 19, 2007

Strategy for RMG1

I seek to exploit inefficiencies that exist in the buy/sell side research models for maximum benefit. The greatest gaps in investment coverage appear to exist in global companies, both large and small. I look to own emerging growth companies while paying no more than value prices.

For RMG1, I primarily own larger companies throughout the world featuring strong balance sheets, in investor friendly jurisdictions, that demonstrate accelerating EBITDA growth.

Companies reviewed should meet the following criteria:

  1. Firms should sell for a healthy discount to their peer group on a forward EV/EBITDA basis. I prefer to own stocks which sell for 10X forward EVEBITDA or less.
  2. The company must generate sufficient free cash flow to maintain and grow the business by a minimum 10% per year, without requiring financing. This degree of self sufficiency suggests that conventional investment coverage may be limited or possibly non existent.
  3. Barriers to entry should be sizeable in the industry that the company operates in. I greatly prefer to own businesses that have monopoly or oligopoly characteristics.
  4. Close attention is paid to owning stocks which have experienced a catalyst that should increase EBITDA sharply. The positive catalyst also generally results in improved investment coverage, when sufficient time has passed for analysts to get a handle on the company.

[marketocracy]
Marketocracy Rules | Privacy Statement | Services Agreement | Questions

Copyright © 2006-2008. Marketocracy. All rights reserved
Marketocracy, the Marketocracy logo and m100 are service marks of Marketocracy, Inc.
Patents Pending

All quotes delayed 20 minutes